Post by account_disabled on Dec 20, 2023 1:22:54 GMT -5
The two cases are somewhat different but the same logic applies to a in occupying a leadership position in the movement. The first conclusion of the future scenario before all is that the Todos Front as a political organization cannot function well or at all without unified leadership. It is not easy to think about the future against such an adverse backdrop and such a high degree of uncertainty. When Alberto Fernández took office in January 2016, the world was plunged into a pandemic.
Now this year as the pand Job Function Email List emic recedes the world is plunged into a global conflict over Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Different scenarios arise in this framework. The first is the institutionalization of internal disputes. In this case all existing sectors of Kirchnerism, Albertism and Massismo will agree to resolve the question of leadership in internal elections, whether open, simultaneous and compulsory primaries or other types of elections . That choice means trying to get out of the current quagmire of bets.
Transform Peronism into a bureaucratized party which it had never been until now. Such a thing seems unlikely to happen these days because whoever loses is automatically out of the running for the presidency. Alberto Fernandez has said he will promote the route with him as a rival but the chances of a deal seem slim. The second scenario is that Alberto Fernandez decides to break with Kirchnerism just like Néstor Kirchner did with Eduardo.
As Alder did he ultimately established Albertism. There are undoubtedly people close to the president who have advised him to take this path but Fernandez himself seems very reluctant to do so. Would you win if you did that? Indeed he would have the support of some unions some governors and mayors and maybe social movements and maybe even some business people. But Néstor Kirchner raised it with him after he had built up huge popularity in Duhalde during a period of economic growth.